<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goldstone&#8217;s Population Bomb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.populationinstitute.org/2010/03/10/goldstones-population-bomb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.populationinstitute.org/2010/03/10/goldstones-population-bomb/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:09:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Howard</title>
		<link>http://blog.populationinstitute.org/2010/03/10/goldstones-population-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 17:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.populationinstitute.org/?p=254#comment-590</guid>
		<description>In 1969, I wrote a thousand-word essay for a college english class challenged to solve poverty. I typed &quot;Quit birthing.&quot; 500 times. The professor said either I had misspelled the term for docking a boat, making the essay absurd, or I had used a gerund that is not in the dictionary (1969) which meant half the essay was missing. I failed, but in the world that counts, the professor failed.

Ordinary people, at some level, know growth hurts — long lines, traffic jams, poor social conditions. 
Underpopulation IS a word.
Imagine today&#039;s technologies serving yesterday&#039;s population.
Make love, not kids.
IUDs save trees.
Condom, not dumb.
VASECTOMY =  REVOLUTION
Perpetual overpopulation, how&#039;s that workin&#039; for ya?
Camp in the wilderness? Make your reservation first.
Modern ag grows food from oil, and we are running on empty.
Overpopulation = wars ∴ underpopulation ≈ peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1969, I wrote a thousand-word essay for a college english class challenged to solve poverty. I typed &#8220;Quit birthing.&#8221; 500 times. The professor said either I had misspelled the term for docking a boat, making the essay absurd, or I had used a gerund that is not in the dictionary (1969) which meant half the essay was missing. I failed, but in the world that counts, the professor failed.</p>
<p>Ordinary people, at some level, know growth hurts — long lines, traffic jams, poor social conditions.<br />
Underpopulation IS a word.<br />
Imagine today&#8217;s technologies serving yesterday&#8217;s population.<br />
Make love, not kids.<br />
IUDs save trees.<br />
Condom, not dumb.<br />
VASECTOMY =  REVOLUTION<br />
Perpetual overpopulation, how&#8217;s that workin&#8217; for ya?<br />
Camp in the wilderness? Make your reservation first.<br />
Modern ag grows food from oil, and we are running on empty.<br />
Overpopulation = wars ∴ underpopulation ≈ peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Miller</title>
		<link>http://blog.populationinstitute.org/2010/03/10/goldstones-population-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 16:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.populationinstitute.org/?p=254#comment-589</guid>
		<description>What the world really needs, to avoid the dire consequences of overshooting carrying capacity by the temporary and ephemeral use of fossil fuels, is a declining population in all nations and a return to simpler means of food production. We should be embarking on a massive campaign to provide univeral access to contraception and the motivation to use them through education. Since this does not appear likely, given the conservative viewpoints in many nations, it is more likely we will have to deal with lots of turmoil and higher death rates. Mr. Goldstone, I believe did not mention &quot;peak oil&quot; as an important factor in our future, but it will impact food production and prices at a time when the demand for food by growing populations is increasing.
All of this overpopulation/human condition phenomenon was treated quite well by Ken Boulding when I was a senior in high school.  His poem is still an insightful gift to us all. If only more would understand the implications.

Conservationist’s Lament
By Kenneth Boulding
In: Man’s Role in Changing the Face of the Earth, 1956
University of Chicago Press, p. 1087

The world is finite, resources are scarce,
Things are bad and will be worse.
Coal is burned and gas exploded,
Forests cut and soils eroded.
Wells are dry and air’s polluted,
Dust in blowing, trees uprooted,
Oil is going, ores depleted,
Drains receive what is excreted.
Land is sinking, seas are rising,
Man is far too enterprising,
Fire will rage with Man to fan it,
Soon we’ll have a plundered planet.
People breed like fertile rabbits,
People have disgusting habits.

Moral: The evolutionary plan went astray by evolving Man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the world really needs, to avoid the dire consequences of overshooting carrying capacity by the temporary and ephemeral use of fossil fuels, is a declining population in all nations and a return to simpler means of food production. We should be embarking on a massive campaign to provide univeral access to contraception and the motivation to use them through education. Since this does not appear likely, given the conservative viewpoints in many nations, it is more likely we will have to deal with lots of turmoil and higher death rates. Mr. Goldstone, I believe did not mention &#8220;peak oil&#8221; as an important factor in our future, but it will impact food production and prices at a time when the demand for food by growing populations is increasing.<br />
All of this overpopulation/human condition phenomenon was treated quite well by Ken Boulding when I was a senior in high school.  His poem is still an insightful gift to us all. If only more would understand the implications.</p>
<p>Conservationist’s Lament<br />
By Kenneth Boulding<br />
In: Man’s Role in Changing the Face of the Earth, 1956<br />
University of Chicago Press, p. 1087</p>
<p>The world is finite, resources are scarce,<br />
Things are bad and will be worse.<br />
Coal is burned and gas exploded,<br />
Forests cut and soils eroded.<br />
Wells are dry and air’s polluted,<br />
Dust in blowing, trees uprooted,<br />
Oil is going, ores depleted,<br />
Drains receive what is excreted.<br />
Land is sinking, seas are rising,<br />
Man is far too enterprising,<br />
Fire will rage with Man to fan it,<br />
Soon we’ll have a plundered planet.<br />
People breed like fertile rabbits,<br />
People have disgusting habits.</p>
<p>Moral: The evolutionary plan went astray by evolving Man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frosty Wooldridge</title>
		<link>http://blog.populationinstitute.org/2010/03/10/goldstones-population-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>Frosty Wooldridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 14:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.populationinstitute.org/?p=254#comment-588</guid>
		<description>Goldstone chastises Ehrlich without warrant. As global population adds a whopping 77 million annually, the World Health Organization shows 18 million humans die of starvation and starvation related diseases each year. You cannot cover up that HUGE number by dismissing Ehrlich or Malthus. Their timing may have been off, but they nailed it. We cannot count on another &#039;green revolution&#039; nor can we count on enough water.  We face species extinction and horrific human suffering on multiple levels. To write excuses for human population growth proves irresponsible and nonsensical. Either humans move toward population stabilization by birth control or Mother Nature will do it for us. And, Mother Nature always bats last.  FW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goldstone chastises Ehrlich without warrant. As global population adds a whopping 77 million annually, the World Health Organization shows 18 million humans die of starvation and starvation related diseases each year. You cannot cover up that HUGE number by dismissing Ehrlich or Malthus. Their timing may have been off, but they nailed it. We cannot count on another &#8216;green revolution&#8217; nor can we count on enough water.  We face species extinction and horrific human suffering on multiple levels. To write excuses for human population growth proves irresponsible and nonsensical. Either humans move toward population stabilization by birth control or Mother Nature will do it for us. And, Mother Nature always bats last.  FW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samuel mwaniki m</title>
		<link>http://blog.populationinstitute.org/2010/03/10/goldstones-population-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>samuel mwaniki m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.populationinstitute.org/?p=254#comment-359</guid>
		<description>In the long run, increased productivity, not procreation, will determine whether America and other countries prosper.
Even then Jack A. Goldstone’s article has truth To my understanding most industrialised nations are having negative birth rate yet the rate of keeping resources supply is higher than consumption ,hence need balancing [immigration and extetion of citizeen.
While in developing nation consumption rate is very high compaired to supply this affect both economic as well as politics.*compaire the two developed and developing nation currently on both political and economic issue.
Alot of altitude change and understanding is very necessary toward developing nation community more than family planning assistance.living in developing nation Kenya am much aware of ignorant or naivity from  community on these issue which even with free birth control assistance can not improve.
Awareness is very neccesary if resources availability is to meet demand .
I did advocate Goldstone&#039;s thought on regional birth rate control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the long run, increased productivity, not procreation, will determine whether America and other countries prosper.<br />
Even then Jack A. Goldstone’s article has truth To my understanding most industrialised nations are having negative birth rate yet the rate of keeping resources supply is higher than consumption ,hence need balancing [immigration and extetion of citizeen.<br />
While in developing nation consumption rate is very high compaired to supply this affect both economic as well as politics.*compaire the two developed and developing nation currently on both political and economic issue.<br />
Alot of altitude change and understanding is very necessary toward developing nation community more than family planning assistance.living in developing nation Kenya am much aware of ignorant or naivity from  community on these issue which even with free birth control assistance can not improve.<br />
Awareness is very neccesary if resources availability is to meet demand .<br />
I did advocate Goldstone&#8217;s thought on regional birth rate control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

